lohgan:

This sums up my life pretty well

lohgan:

This sums up my life pretty well

(via cerebralhighway)

@1 week ago with 260610 notes

(Source: doherti, via sleepingwithsenpai)

@1 week ago with 64501 notes
new-england-living:

#MIDTERMS
@1 month ago with 61835 notes

5by5kevin:

Roses are red
And true love is rare
Booty booty booty booty
Rockin’ everywhere

(via thatrareniceguy)

@1 month ago with 293657 notes
bluepueblo:

 Englishman River Falls. Vancouver Island. British Columbia
photo via debby

bluepueblo:

Englishman River Falls. Vancouver Island. British Columbia

photo via debby

(via mymindatease)

@1 month ago with 4067 notes

ryanpanos:

Frozen Venice | Robert Jahns | Via

(via rustyturnip)

@1 week ago with 32803 notes
@1 week ago with 124665 notes

(Source: snaillsss, via ohj33zelektra)

@1 month ago with 180282 notes
chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.


To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:
Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?
Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255. On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.
And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.

To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:

Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?

Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.

And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

(Source: halcy, via mymindatease)

@1 month ago with 53165 notes

(Source: sharmanzard, via woah-awks)

@1 month ago with 55773 notes